this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
454 points (98.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

43868 readers
853 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That doesn’t change how it’s being used or why it was invented.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I'm only countering your claim where you seem to be suggesting that the term AGI was made up to market LLMs. It wasn't - that term has existed for a long time.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You are glomming onto a slightly poor wording choice on my part because you are wrong and desperate to salvage a win from this conversation and I wish you could just admit it.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That slightly poor wording choice was my entire point.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I know, your whole point is missing mine.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 0 points 6 days ago

There's nothing else in your reply for me to respond to. I made a comment about statistical probabilities and you responded with ramblings about AGI that in no way address anything I said. You're entitled to your opinion and I'm not interested in trying to convince you otherwise.