this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
89 points (100.0% liked)
Chevron 7
2001 readers
32 users here now
Chevron 7
A community for sharing humor about Stargate in all its iterations.
Rules:
- Follow the Lemmy.World Terms of Service. This includes (but is not limited to):
- Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other people or groups of people.
- Always be respectful of the privacy of others who access and use the website.
- Links to copyright infringing content are not allowed
- Stay on topic. Posts must be directly related to Stargate, be it a meme, joke, screenshot, discussion prompt, etc.
- Be good, don't be bad. You're an adult, or close enough, I trust you know how to act around people.
For more general Stargate content, visit !stargate@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
PSA, populating all four DIMMs on a modern AMD platform has the potential to reduce achievable stable memory frequency
Is that true? How come?
Basically the memory controller has to work double duty to run 4 sticks instead of 2. Not all memory controllers are fast enough to handle all 4 slots at the full speed. It's going to depend on your specific motherboard though, it's not a global rule that 4 sticks is always slower than 2.
I couldn’t accurately describe the complete technical reason why, but if you have a look at the specs for an AMD CPU like the 9800X3D (https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-7-9800x3d.html):
Most samples will actually support frequencies in excess of that, what is published is what is guaranteed to work among non-defective chips.
It has to do with the overall bandwidth of the CPU’s Integrated Memory Controller.
Back before AMD published this info, I had diagnosed a few cases where support for a given frequency changed based on what I thought was capacity (e.g 24GB vs 32GB) but may have actually been related to module count.
Also a reminder that frequency is not everything, timings are nearly as important. A lower frequency with tighter timings can achieve better performance.