Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
For answers to historical questions, please check out our sister community: !askhistorians@lemmy.world
view the rest of the comments
The general consensus outside tech bros and climate deniers is that CCS projects are bullshit. I'm sure you will find a bunch of researchers willing to say otherwise, it was just the same for cigarettes, alcohol, abestos, etc. I'm sure their labs are well funded too.
The change in CO2 concentration in the air is relatively small in spite of its effect on climate, so I doubt it can cause a change in itself (like doping photosynthesis). The change in temperatures and humidity seems to have negative effects overall (wildfires, droughts).
Planting trees to turn into biomass doesn't really work in practice because they burn from wildfires. Also, we need the land for agriculture because the yields are dropping. Moreover, the wood is burnt as an energy source the moment its price becomes competitive against oil, which is increasingly likely to happen in the future (especially if your country doesn't produce its oil).
Sorry if I sound like a downer, have a nice day nonetheless.
Hey, truth matters even if it's unpleasant. I hope we do fix things as best we can.