this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
67 points (97.2% liked)
History
24124 readers
5 users here now
Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.
c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting
Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.
Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).
When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.
Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

It says WIE•WOL•ICH•BIN•DER•VOGEL•HAS•NOCH•DEN•ERFRET•MICH•DAS according to the article https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/26884
ty! wasn't familiar enough with the script to not be confused. ~1500 is not my forte. :(
it says pretty much what you got there. but i could give some explanations? "wie wol" is still around today as "wiewohl", but pretty archaic. "der vogel has" is a pretty old construction. i'd translate it as "the hate(object) of the birds". "den" is aequivalent to "dann" in modern german (or in northern german often "denn"), not the article "den". "erfrēt" is "erfreut" in the modern standard. "wie wol … noch den …" is just "even though … still …"
i don't like "the hated bird" bc it doesn't say by whom. i would read that as "hated by the birds", hen again i might be projectin earlier stages of german into that.
I got the erfreut thing, although admittedly just because it was the closest word I knew. Den works because den is still den in other languages.
For the rest I am listening, I am learning, I am remembering why I didn't take German in high school.
texts that are 500 years old aren't the friendliest to a modern reader usually, high school educated or not. actually good job trying to make sense of it.:)
just one addition "noch den", odd as it is, lives on in the modern "dennoch". which i didn't see until just now.