this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
420 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

5190 readers
116 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dbtng@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This article whitewashed the whole thing and accepted LG's angle, right up to reprinting their bullshit in full.
Such crap is entirely insufficient for a tech publication, "Tom's Hardware has not independently verified either the claims made by Gamers Nexus in its documentary or LG's counterclaims."

Why? Why did you publish and throw up your hands saying "we know nothing"?
Was there possibly some money involved? Don't want to piss off your advertisers?
I reviewed this Stephen Warwick's articles. He's a corpo shill.
Miserable excuse for journalism.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately tomshardware is not what it was 20+ years ago.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Tom sharded in his wares

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago

I mean, when you have LG ads plastered all over your site, who are you going to side with?

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 week ago

Don’t want to piss off your advertisers?

It's just that.