this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
213 points (97.3% liked)

interestingasfuck

9827 readers
847 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gallery image 2

Gallery image 3

Gallery image 4

Gallery image 5

Gallery image 6

Gallery image 7

Gallery image 8

Gallery image 9

Gallery image 10

Gallery image 11

Gallery image 12

Gallery image 13

Gallery image 14

Gallery image 15

Gallery image 16

Gallery image 17

Gallery image 18

Gallery image 19

Gallery image 20

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's because they are all manipulated to look that way. They are beautiful as art but if you were standing where the photographer stood and seeing these scenes with your eyes, this is not what you would see. In an increasingly digital world where everything we see is manipulated, I am starting to long more for photos that show me what my eyes would see. Ironically it hasn't been all that long that we've been able to do that very well with cameras at resolutions that approximate our visual capabilities. Yet soon after we could do that we've switched to making photos look like paintings.

[โ€“] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its never been true that cameras capture what you see exactly, our vision is constantly adjusting for light value. If I take a picture of a sunset facing the sun, I can see both the sky and the ground in good detail, if you want to accomplish that with a photo, you'll either need a gradient filter and overexpose, or take bracketed shots and transpose them. (e: what I mean to say is, to get to a point of what the artist sees, it always requires post processing)

There's also the issue that our vision has a very narrow point in which you process fine details, just try to read something in your periphery, you'll find the spot you can read is quite small.

Either way, I'm being a pendant, I know what you mean, some of the best shots in this series are the abstract ones IMHO, they represent a change in perspective we don't take into account or see often, the wide ones that are clearly trying to represent a scene are very processed, to the point where I see how AI came to give glowy soft edges to everything