this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
509 points (92.1% liked)

Greentext

8813 readers
1000 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Please note: I chose the word "normal" for lack of a better word, and in its most technical sense only. I do not want to imply any moral judgement.

But in that sense of the word, yes, shrugging when the news show pictures of dead innocents is "normal". Just like not too long ago it was normal to not treat black people like human beings, or a bit before that, to burn people who disagree with your religious dogma at the stake. In another part of the world, it was normal to sacrifice a poor sod every now and then to make sure the harvests are successful. And don't get me started on the history of wars. All of this is "normal" as in, it was perceived to be just how things are by the majority.

Actually, I believe that only by understanding that normal and morally right do not necessarily have anything in common, one can understand how bad the "normal" is, and demand change. "Can't you see this is bad and we need to do something" does not work because no, it is normal to do nothing. Creating a new normal is pretty damn hard, creating a morally better one is even harder.