this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
69 points (88.8% liked)

Technology

87896 readers
3843 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

While I agree that this sounds like all the drawbacks of an ereader with none of the bonuses of a phone, I think compartmentalisation is a pretty big factor. If the back of your phone is for reading, some people will be less likely to get distracted while their phone is flipped over - even though they're literally holding the likely source of their distraction.

[–] kip@piefed.zip 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

you can't overstate how much nicer it is to read on an eink screen compared to a phone. but the magnet gimmick is silly, it's hard to use it like that and negates one of the main benefits, which is how light it is

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I have an eink ereader, and it really is wonderful, but I absolutely would not use it as much if it was the size and shape of my phone. For short stretches I guess it's fine, but one of the reasons I got an ereader is because my phone was so ergonomically bad for reading.

[–] kip@piefed.zip 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

i'll try not to sound like a shill here (i bought the x4 a few months ago) but i thought the same and tried it anyway due to how cheap it was. the text can of course be set to the same size you like it on a normal ereader but it's so light that you can hold it in thumb + forefinger without effort, i quickly came to prefer it over the old kindle paperwhite i was using

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, people seem to really like them based on the comments here. 70 seems silly to essentially combine two products I already have, but I may give it a week or so and if it's still top of mind go ahead with it. I really appreciate people bothering to share their experiences with it, since I really was not convinced by the article.

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 2 points 3 hours ago

I think of it less as "combine", and more "separate" on purpose. There's the images pointing out how much stuff one had to carry before that a smartphone replaces as one slab but... it doesn't do most of those things as well.

I really like my X4 from that standpoint. It's much longer battery than my phone screen grants, and I don't have to open any menus to toggle anything to say "go away, notifications", or anything like that. I'm separated from everything else on my phone while I read on it.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 2 points 21 hours ago

That's fair. I did get an ereader in part to have a dedicated device for reading that had an eink display, so I get that desire. Part of me still feels it's a bit ewaste-y, but whatever gets people to read more is generally good in my opinion.