Gaming

8263 readers

935 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.

2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.

I should not need to explain this one.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.

Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

onlinepersona@programming.dev

172

Video games (lemmy.ml)

submitted 17 hours ago by GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to c/gaming@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/52327207

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What's your point?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

You said

It's good historically. Publishers and developers didn't really care much about story in their games before then (2013). "Video Game story" was often horribly bad, like porn acting; but more often it was just forgettable. Like mandatory lubricant to keep the gameplay going, rather than a feature to make good.

[...]

After The Last of Us, publishers suddenly realised that people actually really like it when their videogames have good stories, that make sense narratively, have twists, low plot holes, emotional investment and climax, etc. Now we have even better stories [...]

My reply gives counter-examples

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 49 minutes ago

And you said

Not much

You're still being vague. I assume you're implying that the existence of games like Final Fantasy 7 (1997) having a good story for it's time, means that no other game from then on can have a story that's revolutionary for it's time? It's nonsensical. Technology improves, storywriting gets better, game mechanics get woven into the narrative.

Good stories in games back then were the exception, not the norm. Listing a few exceptions doesn't counter anything.