this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
175 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87924 readers
3133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
175
Wikimedia Foundation Workers Overwhelmingly Vote to Form Union with CWA (wikiworkersunited.org)
submitted 3 days ago by beep@piefed.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1383383/wikimedia-foundation-workers-overwhelmingly-vote-to-form-union-with-cwa

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Good. I hope i can restart my monthly donations soon again.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

I mean, Wikipedia still refused to recognise the union. They have to now given the results of the vote. And I'm sure they get more than enough in donations anyway. They did before the dispute with their workers, and I doubt enough people boycotted Wikipedia over it for it to mean that Wikipedia can't cover their costs.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wikipedia is flooded with donations. They are super corrupt. Do not give them more money.

[–] arthropod_shift@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If not them, who? I don't know of any project that comes close to Wikipedia, and as someone who doesn't know anything about their internal politics (although I'm open to learn), I feel like it would be a bigger tragedy if it went under. It seems to benefit from being independently funded instead of either being absorbed by some corporation with other motives, or being replaced by a product from some corporation.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Here is an article about the issue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fundraising/issues

There was a great graph which I cannot find about how Wikimedia (Wikipedia owners) is hoarding massive amounts of money and doing unnecessary fundraisers. Their capital has bloated to infinity. Wikimedia already is a corporation.

To top it off their owners are Zionists who tried to use their influence to stop the Wikipedia page calling Gaza a genocide but failed.

[–] arthropod_shift@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I read through the page and I understand the problem better, but I still don't know what I could do differently as an occasional donator. I found this for helping with development, but I'd prefer to support with donations since I don't really have time for more dev work. Is there some way to donate directly for the operating costs, or to volunteers, or something?