this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)
AskHistorians
1458 readers
24 users here now
QUESTIONS
- Be civil.
- Be specific.
- Historical topic must be from at least 20 years ago.
- Post questions in the title. Elaboration is for the text box.
RESPONSES
- Be civil.
- Provide comprehensive answers.
- Please provide primary and secondary sources upon good faith request. Tertiary sources, like Wikipedia, are not accepted.
askhistorians is a community for academic answers to questions about history. Polls, opinions, bigotry, grammar pedantry, and personal insults will be removed.
Be sure to check out our partner community at: !askscience@lemmy.world !ireland@lemmy.world !dataisbeautiful@lemmy.world !canada@lemmy.ca !world@lemmy.world
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
FDR wanted to get involved, but he knew that the American public didn't want to go to war. There was a lot happening before the war like the Lend-Lease Act where the USA was funding Allied war efforts while officially remaining neutral. Having a burning naval base in Hawaii and an official declaration of war from Germany and Italy gave FDR a wide berth public opinion wise to prosecute the war the way he wanted to.
Also, while there was a "Europe first" policy, the USA was active in the Pacific Front soon after the attack as the USA had to respond to further Japanese invasions including the Philippines, which was still American controlled. The USA was able to turn the tide on Japan and push Japan back to the home islands while still dedicating the majority of its war effort to Germany. The only time when the USA needed to significantly pull resources to the Pacific Front from Europe was for the planned invasion of Japan.