this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
65 points (98.5% liked)

Games

26027 readers
38 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
65
Sony lawyers argue that nobody is stupid enough to believe they actually own digital games, because then only one person could buy GTA 6 (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 2 days ago by hamburgheftig@feddit.org to c/games@sh.itjust.works
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Its not the source code, and nobody ever suggested or thought buying the game meant you owned the source code. What you buy is a copy of the compiled code and assets, which is what everyone assumed.

The problem is how do you enforce deletion of the copy if it gets resold? Thats why games use licenses now, it was the path of least resistance that also gave the publishers more control than they should have had.