this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
33 points (78.9% liked)

Linux

15039 readers
429 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes, that too.

Incentivizing hiding LLM use would be a problem. Encouraging disclosure is good.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Plus if the general requirement is 'high quality code' then that automatically excludes the majority of LLM usage where people just vibe code it and rely heavily on the LLM to do the work. VS someone writing their own code while using an LLM to help find problems.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well... IMO, there's a whole spectrum between "very rare LLM brianstorming/troubleshooting" and "I don't know how to code" vibe-coding, and Im not sure what the distribution looks like.

Personally, I get LLMs to generate boilerplate, formatting, and functions, but manually write plenty and audit/assemble all the pieces myself. But I would not call myself a vibecoder; I loathe vibe coding.