this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
30 points (96.9% liked)

Common Good

51 readers
19 users here now

Useful news about improving people’s lives, not party politics, political tribalism, or endless ideological arguments. Topics include workers’ rights, unions, economic inequality, poverty, education access, prison reform, civil rights, public services, cooperatives, and democratic socialist ideas.

Rule 1: No serial downvoting. Let's keep Lemmy positive. Automod on duty.

Rule 2: Be civil. Play nice. And If you don't like it here, just find a different community.

Rule 3: Weird that I have to make this an actual rule, but here we go: No advocating violence or murder.


founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I love reading about the interfaith community of Americans pushing back on this. This story is often shaped as this “believer” v “non-believer” debate, or it’s about the Satanic temple doing its thing.

Hearing about this variety of faiths, including other Christians, Jewish, Islamic, Buddhist, Hindu, UU, and so on, saying, “Families should get to decide what faith is taught to their kids, not the state,” is the kind of group and argument that could win at the Supreme Court. America is still about all faiths & none, says the FIRST amendment. All others come after it or stem from it.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah, this was settled September 17, 1787.

The supreme court should be falling over themselves to swat this down.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

Frankly, most religious claims should not be protected by the first amendment. Like yelling "fire" in a crowded theater when there is no fire, using baseless declarations to manipulate people causes needless harm.