1150
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

240 times. It took me two minutes to finish the "minigame" last time I did it. That's 8 hours of grinding to max out every skill. Not 8 hours of fun gameplay and visually interesting dragon fights and dungeon crawls, 8 hours (that's eight hours) of flying from one shiny spot to the next. Eight. 8. Hours. Of slow-ass zero G floating.

Last time I booted the game up, I fast traveled to my ship, took off, and heard Sarah say she has something for me. Something about that same line played for the millionth time absolutely killed my motivation to play, and I haven't started the game up in like a week. The romance system is too much too fast. I went from "flirting" with Sarah to married in like 4 hours. We've known each other for all of one in-game month. Maybe I'm just a broken person, but the way we talk sounds so disingenuously infatuated.

I think about the concept of playing, and it sounds fun in theory, but realistically what am I gonna get done in the next 8 hours? I'll talk to people that I don't care about to move through a story that I'm fundamentally disinterested in because I know that >!in order to max out the dragon shou–I mean, Starborn powers, I'll need to jump through and abandon alternate universes like Rick Sanchez but not as an ironic critique of internet nihilism. Hours and hours and hours wasted on >!timelines I don't care about just to get to the end game where I... have strong powers and a good ship, and can't connect with any of the characters because they'll be the tenth iteration of the same ones that I could never convince myself to care about before.!<

Maybe in a year or two after the game has been updated, I'll check it out again. Maybe I can shut my brain off for a minute and pretend I'm not >!grinding through universes!< if it doesn't take me eight hours to max out all the powers. Or maybe I'll just play BG3 when it comes to Xbox and forget that Starfield ever existed in the first place

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 year ago

The fact BG3 came out just before Starfield made me dislike the game even more than I probably would have I think. I went from playing probably the best RPG ever to Starfield, which doesn't even try to make you think you're playing any role except the chosen one. The fact that you join Constellation and almost instantly become not just a full member, but the person who everyone else takes orders from is rediculous.

The story sucks, the gameplay is bland, and there are so many friction points that constantly make you think about the fact you're playing a game. It's honestly sad. I love sci-fi so I was reasonably excited for the game, even knowing it'd be a modern Bethesda game, and it still let me down. The sci-fi concepts in the game aren't even done well.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

The release timing is unfortunate.

It really does show that Bethesda are running about 10 years behind everyone else.

It cost them twice as much to make as BG3 did. How? Just compare any BG3 character and how animated they are thanks to full motion capture, to the same Bethesda animatronics they've used since forever.

[-] alp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

It is not unfortunate, it is a strategic win by Larian. BG3 was actually supposed to come very late, but Larian released it early after learning about Starfield's release date.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

They needn't have worried. At all.

People are even talking about Cyberpunk 2077 favourably again. That's how much shit Starfield is getting.

[-] leftzero@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Cyberpunk 2077 was good (on PC) when It came out, and now it's great. It has earned that favourable talk.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
1150 points (96.1% liked)

> Greentext

7512 readers
7 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS