this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
173 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

5097 readers
129 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You usually buy phones intended for custom roms used, so the release price doesnt really matter imo. The question is how longlived will they be. Swappable battery? Stuff like that.

[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

True. For this specific case dont expect low used prices.

Experts take care and dont sell their devices.

Dumb people buy the new phone and then sell it because they switched to an iPhone or something... dumb. That is why there are so many low-spec Pixels on the used market. Try finding a 500gb Pixel pro used!

Same will be the case with used top tier Motorola phones. Lower userbase and those people are less likely to sell them.

A Pixel 9/10 is kinda premium but the normal one. The a is the lower tier but also runs GrapheneOS. But the a is not the generally advertized model for cheaper, it is released separately and has obvious downsides because you always have a direct comparison. It is simply way less likely for people to buy "the regular Pixel" (which is kinda premium) than for people to buy the top tier Motorola

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

If Graphene is in control of production in any way: Probably about 7 or more years of support

If Motorola is in control: it may be DOA

Not wanting that to happen but Motorola's track record is NOT good at all for that kind of thing.

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Motorola is doing the porting at the moment. But yeah its hard to say. Ideally tho we need Qualcomm and Samsung to bring higher end security to lower end processors to get more options

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I seriously doubt Motorola/Lenovo is "doing the porting", I don't see the GrapheneOS letting others mess with the software. The GrapheneOS team are going to control the production of the hardware to their specs and then install the software after the sale or even sell it themselves.

[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

I understood this like porting Android to some other chip? But yeah no idea what that means

[–] nathan@piefed.alphapuggle.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Read the text carefully: Motorola is porting firmware/drivers to GrapheneOS specifications. Not actual GrapheneOS code.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yesterday Graphene OS Lemmy drama was the fact that moto is doing all the porting.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"DOA on arrival" ... you know the OA already stands for on arrival right?

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 4 points 6 days ago
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Did you know that pointing out unimportant tautology is the first sign of being a douche-bag?

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago

its almost like an mistake happened.

rip my moto x :(