this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
16 points (80.8% liked)

Science

7259 readers
227 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PapaSquat@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Article contains a lot of words like "suggest" and "maybe," and no actual statistical data. The implication from the headline may be correct or may be a false conclusion drawn from statistical trends driven by other, unidentified factors.

Based on the quoted statements, the researchers themselves seem like they believe that they're justified in following this question, but not sufficiently justified in making any solid conclusions.

If you have time to read the associated studies, it might be worth it, but the linked article itself is mostly premature fluff, and the title and excerpt are 100% clickbait.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Anytime an article says "here's what we know" I classify them as quota articles.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Sciencealert generates all content by AI.