this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
525 points (97.0% liked)
Technology
87597 readers
3692 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
in what world is age restricting a relatively normal camera a reasonable decision?
How the fuck is this a "relatively normal" camera, or ANY kind of "normal"? People like you are the reason these companies get away with shit like this.
because there isn't anything particularly special about it other thsn it being a mass market product
When it breaks laws. My area has two-party consent laws, so recording someone, whether audio or video, without their explicit consent is against the law. Children are often not held to the fullest extent of the law, and if they cannot be held responsible, then they shouldn't have access to such devices until they can be.
I'm not naive to think that these devices will just go away or that the genie can go back into the bottle. But that is where regulation must act to protect people's privacy rights.
what ia the difference between this and a phone taped inside of a shirt?
perhaps it's time to jump back to reddit.
they'll tolerate your feigned stupidity over there.
creep detected