this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
527 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

88199 readers
2717 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 84 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Hoooold up just a minute. How much do these glasses cost? Like hundreds right? What kind of teen boy has that much money to burn? I sure as fuck didn't, and I worked. Their parents bought them, and these are kids, so it's 100% blame on the parents here.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even if the kids bought them it is still the parent’s responsibility to keep their kid from being an obnoxious pervert.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's what really sucks about this.

There's no institutional backlash. (At least not yet. That could change.)

We're depending on parents who park these little shits in front of screens and expect to be left alone while their kids are radicalized.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The alternative is having the rich parents be responsible for the children they breed and that will never happen so suck it up poors

[–] Geologist@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had thousands as a teenager from around 15 years old working part time evening and weekends at barely above minimum wage.

When you have no expenses from living at home, you can save everything (and in my case blow it all on electronics lol)

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Parents with more money than sense

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not much different than a kid asking for a playstation or iphone for Christmas

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is because you dont use your playstation to harass girls at school

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they can already use their phone for that

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Those are also banned in class, or they should be, every school has different policies of course.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 weeks ago

they mostly aren't banned yet

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

Rich kids. The worst type as they're also the least likely to get meaningfully punished.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When I was 16 and started working, I quickly had enough money saved from working minimum wage, part time, to buy myself a car. It's not impossible.

Also, these may be kids/young adults, but they should all know right from wrong. Blame is absolutely on the students who use these too.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No different to mobile phones or iPods or PlayStations. Pair of meta raybans are arguably cheaper than those items now due to inflation.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago

These devices are fundamentally different to those.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

$99 I believe Kmart in Australia charges for the Anko ones.

Not sure what they connect to though