this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
520 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

87544 readers
2926 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 82 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Hoooold up just a minute. How much do these glasses cost? Like hundreds right? What kind of teen boy has that much money to burn? I sure as fuck didn't, and I worked. Their parents bought them, and these are kids, so it's 100% blame on the parents here.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Even if the kids bought them it is still the parent’s responsibility to keep their kid from being an obnoxious pervert.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That's what really sucks about this.

There's no institutional backlash. (At least not yet. That could change.)

We're depending on parents who park these little shits in front of screens and expect to be left alone while their kids are radicalized.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The alternative is having the rich parents be responsible for the children they breed and that will never happen so suck it up poors

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago

Rich kids. The worst type as they're also the least likely to get meaningfully punished.

[–] Geologist@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I had thousands as a teenager from around 15 years old working part time evening and weekends at barely above minimum wage.

When you have no expenses from living at home, you can save everything (and in my case blow it all on electronics lol)

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Parents with more money than sense

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not much different than a kid asking for a playstation or iphone for Christmas

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is because you dont use your playstation to harass girls at school

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they can already use their phone for that

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Those are also banned in class, or they should be, every school has different policies of course.

they mostly aren't banned yet

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When I was 16 and started working, I quickly had enough money saved from working minimum wage, part time, to buy myself a car. It's not impossible.

Also, these may be kids/young adults, but they should all know right from wrong. Blame is absolutely on the students who use these too.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No different to mobile phones or iPods or PlayStations. Pair of meta raybans are arguably cheaper than those items now due to inflation.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago

These devices are fundamentally different to those.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

$99 I believe Kmart in Australia charges for the Anko ones.

Not sure what they connect to though