this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
10 points (91.7% liked)
Linux Questions
4122 readers
24 users here now
Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)
- stay on topic
- be nice (no name calling)
- do not post long blocks of text such as logs
- do not delete your posts
- only post questions (no information posts)
Tips for giving and receiving help
- be as clear and specific
- say thank you if a solution works
- verify your solutions before posting them as facts.
Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Portage is the only one that makes sense to me. It doesn't try to hide it's internals from the user
Yup.
Invites, even demands, the user have a look and get their hands on, just to use. Very good, keeps userbase more astute. No "convenient" plastic wrap, to keep users ignorant, disempowered and dependent.
Even today, I was looking into updating an ebuild, when a package in an overlay seemed lagging on maintenance, and was no longer successfully emerging. I'd not bother looking into doing such on other distros[1].
::: spoiler 1 oh, exceptions! (... well, maybe yeah, on CRUX, KISS, or Carbs, but that's different ~~ a little ~ still keeps the user apprised of internals (albeit by having even less). I'm still more glad for portage, over those gorgeously simple distros, what with the convenience and power of useflags, savedconfigs, patches, profiles, even keywords (and slots (lol))... convenience that still to access, beckons one into learning more about the system. Portage, still easy choice. Fave. ... Though... Paludis exists too... And that other one, I forget the name of. [Edit: pkgcore] ).