this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
65 points (98.5% liked)

Linux

14756 readers
559 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Linux 7.2 has landed, dragging x86 timing clean out of the nineties by making the Time Stamp Counter mandatory.

I wrote up a quick article on why ditching those ancient legacy fallbacks is good housekeeping, plus a few other bits like cache-aware scheduling and memory tweaks worth noting.

Is anyone still using legacy hardware? If so, what do you use it for?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There are LTS versions outside of current.

But more importantly, who runs anything remotely critical on a 486 these days? These machines choke to death on TLS handshakes.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who said anything about critical?

I just don't want my hard disk wiped when I decide to try a piece of software.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I just don’t want my hard disk wiped when I decide to try a piece of software.

You aren't running any relatively recent software on a 486, period. Even if you did and it turned out to be a virus, the chances of it hitting a bug in the kernel are extremely low.

This is just grasping at straws.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Industrial machine controllers frequently run on ancient hardware

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And they are very notoriously outdated in terms of software.

[–] smaximov@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do they run the latest Linux kernel?