this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5123 readers
147 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
Nath@aussie.zone
29
Child-like sex dolls are being stopped at Australia’s border. They could be an early child protection warning (theconversation.com)
submitted 2 days ago by arbilp3@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Importing these products is illegal. Possession is also a Commonwealth offence carrying a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment.

Available figures indicate the scale is significant, but difficult to track consistently. The Department of Home Affairs recorded 103 detections in 2020–21, 88 in 2021–22 and 29 in 2022–23.

An Australian Institute of Criminology review called for more research in the area, but identified plausible risks involved with owning them, including desensitisation, sexual objectification of children, escalation and use in grooming.

The appropriate response is therefore neither to dismiss these objects as harmless fantasy nor to treat possession as automatic proof of future offending. It’s to recognise them as potential risk indicators that may justify investigation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the default position should be that we need proof that it causes harm before making it illegal.

I don't think it's right to make criminals out of people who aren't hurting others.

[–] T4peMeasure@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

i believe it's quite an accepted pattern of human nature that what we dream/ fantasize/ aspire to do, we would want to do and carry it out in the real-world. hence these child-sex-dolls are dangerous for kids in the society.

[–] TwistedTurtle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

That's the type of rhetoric they used against video games, rap music, and D&D.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 18 hours ago

No.

That's actually quite dangerous wording that has very visible roots in purity politicking and censorship. Fantasy by its very nature is disconnected from action in a healthy human psyche.

I am being very clear that i am not advocating any form of csam, but the subject to hand is being used to permit entry of a very broad accusation here.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i believe it's quite an accepted pattern of human nature that what we dream/ fantasize/ aspire to do, we would want to do and carry it out in the real-world.

The evidence suggests that the use of sex toys reduces the drive to actuate those desires

hence these child-sex-dolls are dangerous for kids in the society.

You haven't proven this, just asserted it poorly.