this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
17 points (94.7% liked)

United Kingdom

6873 readers
227 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Co-operative Group has removed a policy that explicitly allowed trans and non-binary staff to use gendered toilets where they felt “safest”, following new UK guidance on single-sex spaces.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's a lot of nuance hidden by an upsetting headline.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

While the Co-op may not be transphobic itself, single occupant gender-neutral bathrooms are a solution presented by transphobes who want to continue misgendering trans men and women under the veneer of a discriminatory 'compromise'.

Trans people across the UK are having their rights marginalized.

[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How are gender-neutral bathrooms discriminatory? They seem to me to be the perfect solution.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Because requiring that trans people use them instead of the bathroom of the gender they identify as is still exclusionary and transphobic; it tells them that they do not belong to the gender they identify as and/or that they are a danger to cisgender individuals of that gender.

[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And if a site has no gendered bathrooms at all?

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago

Then the UK law would require all such bathrooms to be single-occupant, something that may not be practical for large establishments where multiple patrons of each gender may need to use the bathrooms simultaneously.

The genderless, single-occupant bathrooms argument is a solution derived for a non-existent problem; transgender women are women and transgender men are men and instituting policy that disregards that is discriminatory.

[–] TRAHR@quokk.au 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's segregation unless you meet some nebulous criteria.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

I'm not saying it's good news, it's just more mixed than you'd expect. Just criticising the headline.