this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
627 points (97.1% liked)

Political Memes

12369 readers
1714 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Increasingly more popular opinion: the US government takeover committed by the Trump oligarchy is as much the result of incompetence of the Democratic party as it was a plan of evil 'geniuses'.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd say it's entirely dems fault as they were dropping the ball consistently since years. Trump should've been an easy opponent but he ended up as president second time

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People wanted change. Trump promised change, the democrats promised more of the same.

Maybe democrats should promise change?

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I think the detrimental part was avoiding any polarising subject that could alienate their core electorate. They wanted to retain it so much that they forgot about the general population. And then came Trump promising changes in areas general public had problems with. He was mostly lying, but he was lying about the right topics.

So it came down to the choice: Maybe a lying republican jackass, or total democrat apathy.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yes! IMO the 'evil geniuses' had no effect whatsoever. Trump just wins by default when the Democrats run unpopular candidates.

I've been saying this for almost ten years now. Trump is not a popular candidate and never has been. In '16 he got fewer votes than Romney did in '12. If everyone who voted for Obama had voted for Clinton, Trump never would have won. The same is true with '20 vs. '24: if everyone who voted for Biden had voted for Harris, Trump never would have won the second time.

I also don't think Biden was ever that popular; I think any of the Democratic candidates would have won in 2020. I told anyone who would listen at the time, "Biden is a bad choice, some shit could heat up in Israel, and he's very out of touch with the Democratic base on that issue, and it could prevent him from getting re-elected." I will say, I didn't think Trump would get re-elected after J6, I thought it would be some other Republican. But, it also felt like the Democrats also never really went after Trump for what he did on J6 so.

Anyway, I guess what I'm saying is I agree and I'm glad to hear other people say it. The Democrats are too willing to compromise with Republicans who never compromise with them, and it keeps losing them elections. So even though Americans as we actually exist are reasonably progressive on most issues (legalizing weed and having universal healthcare poll higher than any sitting politician, there are about 1.5x as many registered Dems as Reps in this country, etc), we're stuck with an extremely regressive government. That's the context that leads to progressives like Mamdani winning in "upset" victories and the Democratic leadership is all surprised.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah and you said California banning a chemical wasn't news so that's another indication of how much anyone should take you seriously.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

My opinion on that is totally relevant to my opinion on this. /s

Next time we disagree, please bring a valid argument instead to discrediting because of something i said somewhere else.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

Next time you say something please remember you have bad opinions

[–] Frettchen@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah. There was this drunk driver that hit a kid. Stupid parents. It's just the result of incompetence of the parenting party than a result of drunk driving.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 7 points 2 days ago

They lost to Donald fucking Trump. The biggest loser of all time. And they lost twice.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I dont think that is a fair comparison. Also i am not saying it is only the fault of the opposing party, i'm saying it is as much as. It is naive to think this would have been able no matter what the Democratic party did in the years/decades leading up to the first Trump presidency. Sure it is easy to talk in hindsight, I'll give them that. I'm also not saying they wanted this to happen. But if the parents of the drunk driver never gave their child a good talk on the dangers of drinking, that accident is partly theirs to blame too.

[–] groats_survivor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah. Except the parents insisted their child play in the middle of the street at 1am and instead of condemning the drunk driver, they claim drunk driving is part of life