Programming

28256 readers

215 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

Rust is adopting an LLM policy (blog.rust-lang.org)

submitted 2 weeks ago by pylapp@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] YaBoyMax@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago

Moreover, this is a breach of trust between the reviewer and the author. Our assumption when we review is that we're talking to a real person who wants to do their best work.

I think this is a really excellent point and gets at a general feeling I've had towards LLM-generated PR comments for a while now. I can understand the desire to use LLMs to generate changes (my company pushes AI super hard and it genuinely is a helpful tool in many cases), but to delegate discussion of those changes to an AI model feels extremely antisocial to me. I don't really like the idea of vibe-coding in general, and this practice really distills down everything I don't like about it with an added layer of deception.