this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)
libre
10239 readers
58 users here now
Welcome to libre
A comm dedicated to the fight for free software with an anti-capitalist perspective.
The struggle for libre computing cannot be disentangled from other forms of socialist reform. One must be willing to reject proprietary software as fiercely as they would reject capitalism. Luckily, we are not alone.

Resources
- Free Software, Free Society provides an excellent primer in the origins and theory around free software and the GNU Project, the pioneers of the Free Software Movement.
- Switch to GNU/Linux! If you're still using Windows in
$CURRENT_YEAR, try a GNU/Linux distribution.
Rules
- Be on topic: Posts should be about free software and other hacktivst struggles. Topics about general tech news should be in the technology comm or programming comm. That doesn't mean all posts have to be serious though, memes are welcome!
- Avoid using misleading terms/speading misinformation: Here's a great article about what those words are. In short, try to avoid parroting common Techbro lingo and topics.
- Avoid being confrontational: People are in different stages of liberating their computing, focus on informing rather than accusing. Debatebro nonsense is not tolerated.
- All site-wide rules still apply
Artwork
- Xenia was meant to be an alternative to Tux and was created (licensed under CC0) by Alan Mackey in 1996.
- Comm icon (of Xenia the Linux mascot) was originally created by @ioletsgo
- Comm banner is a close up of "Dorlotons Degooglisons" by David Revoy (CC-BY 4.0) for Framasoft
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Europeans. empoc perspectives are treated as community fracturing.
forking nixos is really trivial since the entire OS is one repo. IMO the cache is supposed to act like a moat to push contributors towards nixpkgs. flakes in many ways facilitate fracturing the ecosystem because its easier to compose your own spin. I'm pretty sure that's how DetNix was able to slowly move off of nixpkgs. Maybe its malicious, but channels basically force you to build your own parallel infrastructure. Flakes have many flaws, don't get me wrong, and I don't think they should be in core, but they aren't useless.
I think NixOS could be managed in a more traditional way to lower the hosting cost. These guys are wasteful because there's very little pressure to optimize their setup. Nix facilitates waste to an extent, but most software is inefficient unless you take steps to fix it.
For my tiny nix distro, I'm perfectly happy asking my users to compile and cache their entire own shit a la gentoo. I'm treating the cache as a nice-to-have. Hopefully some day the Lix community will come up with a cooperative cache proposal (maybe based on trustnix and bit torrent or yggdrasil) that's both scalable and secure.
Idk if NixOS can really downscale like that (or that has any desire to as you said). In any case, the main issue is the lack of leadership to change the status quo. So inevitably the status quo shifts to Detsys run by fascist collaborators who still get to leach off 1000s of hours of collective unpaid labor each year while selling NixOS to startups and venture capital firms (I mean that AI use thread on nixpkgs got really stinky).
I still miss Nix as a technology (containers are relatively painful), but I can't on good conscience continue to use a operating system whose own conscience is being subsumed by techbros and fascist bystanderism. Nixpkgs being in this awkard linchpin spot of having all the political inertia but being hopelessly civility lib isn't great either.
I've spoken before to maintainers like K900 (iirc who is part of the steering committee) and things like git infra independence is not possible for nixpkgs as it's on track to be the largest git repository (forgejo crashes at the size of nixpkgs and github was struggling before the enterprise sponsor). Nix Floral (the lix folks) also have zero plans to recreate nixpkgs due to the same cost/political fracturing.
on the other hand, fuck it. I'll go guix.
Guix will be less reactionary just purely on the virtue of not being hard carried by GitHub enterprise and a bottomless well of AWS storage and compute sponsorships. So many bad decisions made in NixOS were made because the project never actually had to innovate in the face of logistical hardship.
Everyone can get a flake that's pinned to hundreds of different versions of nixpkgs because the binary cache will never penalize them for it.