this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
220 points (92.6% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

7072 readers
1 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They seem to have deleted the post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If by which you mean "almost everyone except America and Canada", yes

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to another comment and the article they cite, it might actually be grounds for a suit in the US too, if the would-be-employee incurs damage for actions taken in reasonable reliance on getting that promised job. I imagine if they quit their old job or rejected other offers because they expected the would-be-employer to honour its promise, that might count as damages.

Whether it's worth suing is a different question, of course.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wild that it's from the pocket of the employee though, here it is usually a government department that handle most legal cases Vs corporate, with that private individuals only have to do it themselves in exceptional cases.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Wild that it's from the pocket of the employee though

It's a repeating pattern, really, like the legal equivalent to The Sam Vimes theory of socioeconomic unfairness: If you can't front the price of asserting your rights, you'll get neither your rights not the money to assert them in the future.