this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
4 points (83.3% liked)
cybersecurity
6409 readers
28 users here now
An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!
Community Rules
- Be kind
- Limit promotional activities
- Non-cybersecurity posts should be redirected to other communities within infosec.pub.
Enjoy!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My experience with it wasn't quite the same, but was similar. When I was looking at it, it was very much in that category of cert that was mostly about memorizing the study guides/books, and less about building/proving a skillset (which, as mentioned, is hardly uncommon with IT certs unfortunately).
Where it did have some "value" was that it was a well-known cert that was very useful for "proving" that your org was in compliance. A badge you could hang to auditors and costumers/clients that said you knew your stuff. Again, hardly uncommon with IT certs. :\
I don't think it's completely worthless. Depending on where you're at in your career, it can be a useful experience. But it should, I think, be treated like a (relatively) beginner-tier cert. Something you might consider at an early point in your journey, but not one I'd necessarily build your resume around. I also think that it's value may depend a lot on exactly what your role in an organization looks like. CEH for an entry-level pen tester or incident handler? Yeah, maybe. For something like an IAM developer or a privacy analyst... eh, less so.
Yep, partially we see the certs as just differentiators between us and "the others" for our customers.
In reality, we don't even do half the things needed to get the certs (take CCNA for example... IPv6 still isn't in use for our customers)