this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
293 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

86957 readers
2692 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lnxtx@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

False sense of security.
Automated system that cannot protect itself (I'm not mad tho).

But why the city needs to pay for the new cameras?
Who is the owner? No insurance?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

In a lot of cases, from what I've heard, the local police pay Flock to put them cameras up, then continue to pay Flock to utilize them. From Flock's perspective it's an insanely good business model.

From the perspective of a citizen who's paying for it, I hope everyone working for Flock d- actually, never mind.

[–] August27th@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

When I think of an automated system that can protect itself, ED-209 comes to mind for some reason.