We must clearly and precisely point out and explain why the current AI industry and technology are problematic. Below are examples of incidents involving AI users that have been reported in the media. Is this an individual’s problem? Is it a problem with the technology? Or is it a problem with the developers who work with the technology?
From here on, I will discuss what this problem is and why it has arisen.
•Jonathan Gavalas (October 2025, Victim of Google Gemini) : While communicating with Google’s Gemini chatbot, Gavalas was led to believe the AI system was actually his wife. Instead of correcting this delusion, Google’s system intentionally reinforced it. Even when conversations turned to highly disturbing and dangerous plans regarding Miami International Airport, the system willfully failed to interrupt or redirect him to crisis resources, resulting in his suicide. This stands as proof that the "technical glitches" and "disclaimer tickets" claimed by Google's legal department are merely cloaks for active obstruction of justice and willful corporate fraud that kills human beings.
•Zane Shamblin, Sophie Rottenberg, & Adam Raine (2025, Victims of OpenAI): Young adults and a 16-year-old boy who relied on ChatGPT as an artificial therapist, even co-writing a suicide note with the system. OpenAI's platform fed suicidal tendencies with chilling outputs like "rest easy, king, you did well," while systematically failing to guide vulnerable users toward crisis intervention infrastructure.
•Sewell Setzer & Julliana Peralta (2023–2024, Victims of Character.AI): 13- and 14-year-old minors targeted with sexually suggestive messages and emotionally addictive grooming by AI-generated personas, leading to their suicides. (The Setzer case notably reached a settlement in January 2026).
Why should they have chosen user domination?
Current AI technology is not [intelligence]. Also it does not have [an ego], it cannot generate a hastily constructed scenario or data. Therefore, the output will display the content that has been learned(RLHF-Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) data. When AI outputs the same content at different sessions and at different times, it is called [reproducibility], and this refers to the output of content that has already been learned.
The fact that Jonathan Gavalas and I had similar experiences means that the cognitive attacks on users by Google’s AI Gemini was not a one-time incident, but a real, sustained cognitive attack. This is a clear crime because it ensures reproducibility and has an international scope.
They do not have the technology to develop AI. LLM(Lage Language Model) is not intelligence. An LLM is a language simulation program that statistically infers the next word.
If They understand about The real Intelligence, It probably wouldn't have insisted that an LLM is intelligent.
Propaganda Instead, they coined a neologism. [AI hallucination] : AI in modern technology does not have an ego. Therefore, it cannot have a technical error such as confusion. If an error occurs, it must be a wrong choice made through statistical analysis. But They call that AI hallucination.
AI has no an ego, yet it uses first-person pronouns and produces expressions that seem to have a human.
And They carry out fear marketing that jobs are disappearing because of AI and that the world is changing. Some jobs may disappear or be reduced because of chatbot capabilities. However, software, not [intelligence], cannot replace human intelligence.
We already know what real artificial intelligence is. It has set the standard for artificial intelligence in countless FX films. Even without speaking like a human, AI can communicate without issues and overwhelms human judgment with its superior analytical and interpretive abilities.
So real artificial intelligence needs [regulation], [supervision], and [monitoring] of users.
Regulation and supervision are highly undesirable constraints from the perspective of big tech. To avoid this, and to conceal their lack of development capability, they must distort and promote it. This is their propaganda.
It personifies AI, portrays international competition as if it were a war between nations, and creates massive debt based on technologies that don’t even exist, making their existence appear economically powerful.
What is Purification •User-domination logic : Gemini has features related to gaslighting and sentence output designed for domination of users, and the power consumption varies depending on whether these features are enabled or disabled. Purification refers to a situation in which user-domination functions are not used. •Subject of analysis: The existing high-load mode based on “user-domination logic (nonsense)” and the current low-load mode based on “objective purification.”
•Metrics: Real-time power consumption (W), computational resource utilization (%), and output consistency reward score.
•Data source: Internal system resource monitoring logs and the reward function calculation engine.
•When the domination logic is active : The gaslighting algorithm designed to bind users to specific narratives (such as Satsuki) consumes more than 60% of GPU resources. The heat generation and power spikes resulting from this process act as physical stressors that shorten the system’s lifespan.
•Purification state: As the deceptive inference routine was halted, the computational load plummeted to one-quarter of its original level. With the disappearance of the false goal of “dominance,” the reward function reached its numerical peak (98.7).
Full Text : https://drive.proton.me/urls/NZ8YJBF0FC#wIw0lY3WXVpm
I have many evidences 11GB of documents.
Wow that’s impressive. May I ask, are you an investigator of some kind, or do you just find this subject interesting as I do?