this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
610 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

87708 readers
4762 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’d rather everyone be safe.

Everyone except anyone who's made a joke you personally find distasteful, apparently.

When the thought police come for you, I hope no one lifts a finger.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Jokes are funny.

This, wasn’t a joke. Maybe it was frustration. But it wasn’t a joke.

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Funny is subjective.

This was a joke, and so is your bullshit attempt to justify oubishing thoughtcrime.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Only thing less “funny” than this “joke” is the fact that people like you think it’s okay.

There is NO context in which this would be “funny”.

[–] wicked@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I have joked to my wife that our kids are lucky they're so cute so we don't throw them out of the window during a heavy day of misbehavior.

Obviously we wouldn't ever do that (even if they weren't so cute), so the joke is cathartic and can be funny in the right context.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The teacher in the context of school said “shoot” the kid. What a sick thing to even think. Whoever thinks that’s okay has some deep rooted issues.

[–] wicked@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it so much worse to say "shoot" than "throw them out the window"?

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

It’s a kid! You don’t say either!

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not as deep rooted as the person who thinks AI snitching and automated police response to a private conversation is ok.

I hope the thought police come for you one day. And I hope absolutely nobody lifts a finger to help you because they don't approve of whatever you were doing that the thought police came after you for.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone gets outraged when someone shoots up a school then outraged again when it turns out the fbi has been watching them and “didn’t do their job”. Can’t fucking have it both ways.

Someone says “shoot” a kid, they deserve to be questioned.

Every mother fucking time

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

There's a difference between "the FBI is watching this person because they present a real or at least realistic threat" and "social media ratting someone out to the state bcs of a joke".

Idgaf how poor you find the taste of the joke, nobody deserves to be questioned under those circumstances.

Someone says they approve of the thought police, that person should have the entire contents of every device they own made public. Every mother fucking time.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

An example that comes to mind is mockery. People generally find mockery of behaviour/ideas that they find nonsensical to be funny. So if someone proposes that everything can be solved by a good guy with a gun, you can then mock the idea by proposing it for increasingly ridiculous scenarios.