this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
538 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

86864 readers
2945 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
538
Student Teacher Sent a Private Snapchat Complaining About Her Workday. An Hour Later, Police Pulled Up to Her School. (www.gadgetreview.com)
submitted 1 day ago by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
386 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Read more carefully. I'm obviously not talking about how these online spaces are legally defined. I'm talking about how the companies instruct their users to use them. I don't blame people for acting in a way that they're told they can act.

"The private chat has no expectation of privacy!"

Orwellian bullshit.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Your issue is one of branding, which is fair. Though, it is not a social media company's responsibility to educate users on the distinction between "private" from other users and "encrypted" from government snooping.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 hours ago

That's the fundamental problem I have with this. I don't believe in trapping people through gotcha bear traps. If you're going to be scanning every message for violations of rules, you shouldn't be advertising that service as private. In fact, they shouldn't even have DMs in that case.