Linux

14548 readers

691 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Linux's Staging Area To Now Reject LLM-Generated Patches, Except For Real Security Fixes (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 7 hours ago by misk@piefed.social to c/linux@programming.dev

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Note, LLMs are very good at finding suspect "security issues" in kernel code these days. But even with the best of the current and next generation tools, at least 1/3 of the results they generate are flat out wrong or harmful. So, if you think your LLM-found/fixed issue in a drivers/staging/ file is really valid, it's fine to submit it BUT you must have first tested it on the actual hardware for the driver, and described how you have done so, in order for us to be willing to take the change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 20 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Record time speedrun from "I'm putting my foot down in favor of AI" to "at least 1/3 of patches are flat out wrong or harmful", eh?

[–] MalReynolds@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago

It was “I’m putting my foot down in favor of AI” for finding security flaws and triaging issues, not writing code. Shit's useful for things that can be easily verified, like security flaws, less so (OK, crap) for writing maintainable code in a massive codebase with highly complex interactions.

[–] strangemath@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago

It’s easy to not have a problem with AI merge requests when you have a whole team of people filtering out the garbage before it gets to you.