this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
605 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

86928 readers
2478 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 252 points 3 days ago (55 children)

The amount of people in this thread that seem to think invasion of privacy is cool to police thought crime is honestly shocking. The subject and subject matter are completely irrelevant.

In addition, teachers are fucking people and venting and joking in private with close friends is sacrosanct.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 92 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My guess is most are very young. Goes to show our civil liberties worldwide, especially since 9/11, have eroded tremendously. Young people have grown up in a world where privacy is a joke and government spying is a foregone conclusion.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I work mostly with people older than myself. The younger ones are shocked by everyone's lackadaisical privacy practices. The older ones all say, "oh well, it's everywhere and I have nothing to hide. It's not like you can get away from it."

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't know a single young person who actually cares about Internet privacy. The vast majority of them are on social media all the time.

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a young people that's a privacy and free speech extremist. Thus, you're refused.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

I now know 1, so that is true.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I realized this because we have a younger engineer who didn’t even have an Adblock running on their browser. When I asked them about it, they just told me that they grew up seeing ads so it doesn’t matter to them 🤯

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 11 hours ago

Damn, it really sucks how normalized internet brainrot is becoming.

load more comments (53 replies)