this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
52 points (96.4% liked)
Technology
86847 readers
2904 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sadly the post isn't about this.
I do discuss the work-life balance, the egregious ways that big tech and major companies robs people from their lives. My focus is to provide a bigger area for the "federated way", even knowing that using this term is already wrong...
But I mostly agree with you, just can't see how coop will solve the deeper structural problems, will solve some of the problems, not all of the problems.
I think the post is about this too, honestly. What the post is saying is that "open source is not enough, we need governance" and I really do not agree. What I am saying is that governance and small pockets of freedom will not solve our problems, just give us the illusion that we are good.
What I am saying is that we don't need small pockets of freedom, but we need to live in total freedom, and technology and software are a big part of that. This society model is destroying everything, from our wellness to the ecosystem, and "small pockets of freedom" won't solve anything.
This is the point we disagree.
Small pockets of freedom can help, this won't solve the global crisis, but will provide for the communities[^1] the needed force. Also, this can help groups to better organize and waste the least amount of money, effort and mind these.
Doing nothing right now will not change anything, and doing anything, even the small actions is the starting point for the next thing.
I'll use myself as example, even knowing that this isn't the perfect one, I started with the homelab because Amazon stole something from me, and I decided the that was enough. Now I can see that the hardware is cheap[^2], software is pretty much everywhere, federated or open-sourced (even better if it's AGPL) and the next point is increase the range, for the smaller groups of people around the house, expanding for the neighbors to embark in this.
[^1]: communities in the physical sense. Group of people, talking in the garden of a common building. Not a digital community. [^2]: most of people that are in my cirle of friends have a old desktop, or laptop around that can be reused for a simple homelab for a tiny group (around ~10 users) for basic usage, so most of people don't need a Google Photos, Docs and such.