this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
17 points (84.0% liked)

Opensource

6515 readers
29 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a general view on the topic. I think open-source isn't enough, we need also governance for the software we use, and create small pockets of freedom.

All feedback is welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, you absolutely don't. Governance is what destroys open-source projects. For instance, GNOME was destroyed and encrappified because of their board, for instance (a bad governance structure). Look at how IBM does governance to Wayland. That should show you that it doesn't work.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Does that mean that we need a different kind of governance, or none at all?

Successful independent projects have some form of governance too, no?

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

The BDFI (Benevolent Dictator for Life) method works as it should. People should be using that one more. For instance, Vim had Moolenar as the BDFI, and it was a good thing for the project.