this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
498 points (96.5% liked)
Enough Musk Spam
3388 readers
1253 users here now
For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.
No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.
Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.
Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.
Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To be fair, what's the point of the bill? Child porn is already illegal. It's like the bills banning non-citizens from voting.
While they're at it, why not ban murder, theft, and drunk driving?
Historically, bills like this that appear to be so obviously "good" are often traps that contain unrelated, nefarious shit. Like hiding a ban on abortion inside a bill that's supposed to be about banning something everyone hates.
I'm highly skeptical of the bill but at the same time I wouldn't put it past Elon to be against it for all the wrong reasons 🤷
They already have.
I read the bill and there are explicit provisions about prohibiting websites from allowing users to create nudified images without technical skill. I don't know existing laws but they might not have put the onus on the company/website and just on the users. This is the full bill, it's a single page: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2025/0/HF/1606/versions/latest/
EDIT: Should point out that the bill is for any unwanted AI Generated nudes of identifiable people, not just minors.
Exactly. It's all about nudification of anyone using AI tools. Not explicitly about children.
Yes, clarified my previous comment to include that fact since it was misleading based on the screenshot. Thanks.
But this closes the hole that the images are of people who dont exist so they are ageless. Idk of anyone has challenged it with that strategy but I can see the supreme cunts ruling that since they are not real people its not CSM. I haven't read the bill but I hope this is the intention.
In your example it'd be CSM, just not CSAM I guess, technically. I think this is more about undressing real people though
I think one of the best arguments to ban AI child porn is because the models have to be trained on something, and that something would be of real children and therefore not a 'victimless' crime in that sense.
Seems fair. Is that really how the training works though? You'd hope they'd have a first-level filtering process that flags things before they get fed into the model but who knows.
There's no way they had any sort of filtering. That would add way too much time and cost to the process of shoving in as much data as possible as fast as possible.
Musk Opposing this is deliberately to frame this as a "anti child porn law" so that people don't realize what's also under the hood.
The first question you should ask is why is Trump signing this into Law?
Actually the first question you should ask is what does this law actually say*? Cuz it doesn't just ban AI child porn.
So as you can see, this bill is clearly a guise for him to legalize outlawing AI fakes of him and/or to allow him to call evidence of his crimes AI and arrest the people who documented it.
The law in question is a Minnesota State Law, not a federal one. Trump isn't involved. Pretty sure that Walz is who would be signing it into law.
Whatever you found in Congress is concerning, though.