this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
120 points (96.2% liked)

interestingasfuck

9455 readers
6 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sergio@piefed.social 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Great question. idk about Sharrock but:

Individuals with hyperthymesia can recall extensive details of their own lives, along with public events that hold personal significance.[7] They often describe their memories as uncontrollable associations: when presented with a date, they immediately "see" a vivid depiction of that day without conscious effort.[8] These memories are strikingly detailed but not literal recordings of experience. In the case of Jill Price, anonymised as "AJ" in the 2006 study by Parker, Cahill and McGaugh,[1] her recollections resembled a movie running in her mind, yet she could not remember incidental details such as what her interviewers were wearing hours earlier.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperthymesia

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Shit think I have this! I too can do that, and my earliest memory is from when I was 6 months old. Yes I can pull them up with great details. But to ask the same questions how can I know if it totally real or my imagination filling in the details? Guess we can't know but I can pull up great details of all of my childhood. The bad and the good so really sucks remembering everything with that much detail.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You should contact some of those researchers. There's only a couple hundred people with this characteristic, they might have a survey or interview for you. It's a pretty interesting cognitive ability to study, it'll probably lead to some insights into human cognition in general.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Hmm interesting maybe I look into it. Thank you.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That description of being shown the event seems to me like not a memory but more like being shown what happened.

Of course we will interpret that as a memory but it may not be. It could be a literal connection to what happened at that time. We only think it's a memory because that's the closest thing we know.

Just thoughts about it.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

I was thinking it's kind of like an AI "hallucination". It's a plausible (but not necessarily accurate) representation of what happened. I wonder in what ways those memories change over time.