this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
357 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86649 readers
2670 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
357
Professor's invisible prompt trap catches 32 students cheating on their midterm with AI (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 day ago by Nobody_Special@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In an online discussion post, Alcorn State University history professor Dr. Jason Gibson posed a question that represented part of his students' midterm. It was about the...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 22 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know that the article was all that badly written, but you missed a couple of points that I'd call essential:

One, it was 32 students out of 35 total who used AI and then didn't even bother to check it, so only 3 students even made an honest attempt in the entire semester.

Two, the professor told the students that they were allowed to contest the grade if they wanted, and only 2 out of the 32 students even tried to contest it.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago

Also later in the article it mentions another professor who estimated that only 2 of their 86 students didn't use AI to cheat.

Like, what are we even doing any more?

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know that the article was all that badly written

Really? I thought it read like a Facebook post.

Regarding specific numbers, I guess they add context to severity, but as far as the headline and snippet of the OP my short snippet answers the bullshit clickbait, which was my intention.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I thought it read like a clickbait article that just quoted verbatim from the social media posts. But I didn't watch the videos, so I don't know how much the article writer left out or added to the story.