this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
39 points (93.3% liked)

Science

7183 readers
21 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the adverse reaction is to the vector, the patient would then experience the negative effects without a chance of getting any benefits.

Yeah but she wouldn't be fucking dead.

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wtf. If she died from the dna editing, doing the test you mention wouldn’t have prevented it. If she died from the formulation, she would have died from the test you talk about. I don’t see a scenario where a test with a control virus makes a difference.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

An allergy test uses small amounts to test for a reaction.

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

She died in kidney failure and thrombotic microangiopathy, not an allergic reaction. They did test for antibodies against the virus. The injection was directly into the cerebrospinal fluid, not exactly the same exposure you get with a skin allergy test.