this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
84 points (96.7% liked)

interestingasfuck

9397 readers
827 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

  1. Posts must be interesting
  2. Posts must be based in reality
  3. No hateful content
  4. No harmful content
  5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 3 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

You probably need to be able to deal yourself the good ones, in addition to this.

[–] Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Knowing what cards your opponent has is a huge enough advantage

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Exactly. This way you know when one of them is bluffing or not. Leveraging an advantage like that is huge in poker.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Not needed, the recent cosa nostra poker scam used a fair shuffler in terms of arranging the cards, but gave a controller behind the scenes the hands.

He then relayed specific instructions to the NBA coaches and athletes in the games coaching them on how to bet.

In a game like bridge, just tracking aces and faces as they go out would be a HUGE advantage.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 6 points 22 hours ago

Not really.

You don't want to win every hand, you want to win often enough that you can keep coming back.

For example, the Allies had broken the Axis codes and knew when and where they'd attack. The problem they had was that if they prevented every attack, sooner or later the Axis would figure out their messages were being intercepted and change codes.