this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
47 points (98.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2869 readers
197 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sadly it's in Spanish, but wanted to support the local selling them in Madrid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Must be a Yankee, calling it blue like the democrats. BTW, the democrats have never been anything remotely like communism... like, ever. The closest the US ever came to a communist vanguard party was the Black Panther Party, who did such fascist things like having a breakfast program for schoolkids or building a health clinic, and they faced slander, imprisonment, and assassination.

Or as Michael Parenti put it so well:

During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.