this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
169 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

86649 readers
2645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I want vehicles that rely on cameras for detecting obstacles to be banned.

Anything that uses reasonable object detection methods should be banned if it lets you drive into a house. My Kia won't let me drive into a house.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Honestly curious, what will your Kia do if you point it at a house and floor the accelerator from a few hundred meters away? I have no idea how my BYD would react and I'm not eager to test it. It has emergency braking, but I don't know how effective that actually is.

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

if you point it at a house and floor the accelerator from a few hundred meters away?

I don't know for sure and I can't think of a good way to test. It certainly wouldn't hit it when "driving itself" with smart cruise control or if I tried to drive into it from a few metres away.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well yeah, but it seems likely in this case the accelerator was being floored, dunno for how long. So much as I hate to give tesla a pass, they're probably not really at fault here unless new info appears.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Well the driver now claims he passed out, so the Tesla definitely isn’t at fault.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

And what if you were doing 70mph for a few hundred meters before the house?

You’d be going right into that house. No car will stop that.

[–] abc@suppo.fi 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

My kid tried to drive it into a hedge and it wouldn't let them. Not the same as accelerating from across the road at a house but also the car makes no self driving claims.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You may as well say you want people banned from driving then. We use “cameras” for object detection.

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We use “cameras” for object detection

lol

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you disagree? Do you understand how we perceive depth?

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you understand that the whole point of self driving cars is to not have humans with eyes and depth perception doing the driving?

Computers can't even reliably differentiate between B and 8.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

It’s to not have humans doing the driving, so people don’t have to drive. It has nothing to do with the biology/mechanics of how we see.