this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
3 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

4159 readers
235 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Earnings is only a small piece of that puzzle," said Lee Ann Scotto Adams, executive director of the Strategic National Arts Alumni Project (SNAAP), a nonprofit that studies the careers of arts graduates.

She and Doug Dempster, the president of SNAAP, worry the new test might lead colleges and universities to preemptively slash low-earning creative arts programs in music, theater, studio art and design. Dempster says that could lead to a further devaluing of jobs that are critical to a well-functioning society.

"We know we need nurses. We know we need journalists. We know we need early childhood educators," he said. "We don't know how many artists we need, but I can guarantee that if you eliminate access, we will impoverish our cultural life nationally."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] seahorse@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone has argued for only arts and no science

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

True, but it's a little more readily apparent when there's no one at the powerplant or water distribution center. Still though it's a balance. All work and no play makes jack a very dull boy.

Edit: didn't know it was such a hot take that the electrical grid going down due to a lack of engineers would likely be more apparent to everyone than a lack of people in theater in plays.