414
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frippa@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I'm a noob, isn't every (open source) program aviable for every distribution if you compile it from source? It's all Linux in the end (i never compiled a program from source, so I don't know if it's easy at all)

[-] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 7 points 1 year ago

Some programs may use libraries or tools specific to a distributions package manager. For example, yay, an AUR helper/pacman wrapper. You would have a very hard time getting it to work on Debian.

Other programs might only include build scripts for a distro specific build system. For example, a program might skip using a Makefile, and do everything in the Arch-specific PKGBUILD.

Generally though, most software uses a standard cross-distro (or even OS) build system. In this case, compiling from source would be an option on any distro. The program might still only be packaged for Arch/NixOS/Gentoo (or others), as it is a very simple process to do so.

[-] thelastknowngod@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Usually the only tricky part of compiling from source is tracking down dependencies. The package manager does that for you normally but you're not using the package manager when compiling from scratch. The actual building (even compiling a kernel) isn't all that complicated.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Usually developers list dependencies in README anyway

[-] thelastknowngod@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

True. It's the dependencies of dependencies where the tricky part starts.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Dependencies almost always are present in distro repos. What's tricky?

[-] thelastknowngod@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If you need the python header files, depending on your distro, you may need to install python3-dev, python3-devel, python3, or some other variation on the name. For a novice, this might not always be obvious and they might not know things like apt-file are helpful for figuring it out.

[-] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Huh. Shouldn't apt install header dependencies too? I'm using system where every package comes with headers, so I don't install headers separately.

[-] thelastknowngod@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Debian and RedHat based distros typically do not bundle them together. The have separate -dev and -devel packages for headers.

[-] SomeBoyo@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, but not every package is in every repository

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
414 points (94.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21244 readers
1310 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS