Independent News
Welcome to the community for independent journalism, a place to post and engage with diverse, free news media from around the world.
The rundown:
-
Posts should link to a current* article from a credible, English, independent news source. If there's a paywall, please put the official link in the URL box and add an archive link in the text body of your post. Blogs, editorials, listicles and reports are welcome.
-
Post title should be the article headline or best fit. Add this tag if an account is needed for access: [sign-in required.]
-
No misinformation. Provide sources when making substantial or potentially destructive claims.
-
Be civil. Be respectful. Be cool. Instance rules apply.
-
Comments or sources that call into question the validity of trans identities will be removed.
-
Abortion and contraceptive access are considered human rights in this community. Sources that disagree may be removed.
- Tag NSFW and apply content warnings at your discretion.
*Independent journalism is generally free from government and corporate interests and is not controlled by a major media conglomerate. "Independence" is a gradient, so use your best judgement when posting.
*Current depends on whether new, publicly available information has been released since the article has last been updated. When in doubt please add the published date to the title in a tag [like this.]
For a less serious news community, check out: !wildfeed@sh.itjust.works
Canadian-based independent news: !indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works
All communities were created with the goal of increasing media literacy and media pluralism.
Some of the independent news sources posted here:
Australia
https://independentaustralia.net/
Canada
Germany
India
https://www.reporters-collective.in/
Philippines
Russia
https://meduza.io/en (based in Latvia)
South Africa
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/
https://groundup.org.za/about/
U.K.
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/
U.S.A.
https://theconversation.com/us
Global
view the rest of the comments
oh wow
since you want to continue having this discussion, mind elaborating wtf that has to do with my comment?
You responded to me? And want to know what reading has to do with a news community?
Listen, my comment is 100% in line with the article and relevant to the discussion. I asked you multiple times what it was that YOU disagreed with and you failed to do so.
Maybe it's you not reading things before commenting.
Not my circus, but:
As such, it's not immediately obvious how, despite your assertion to the contrary. The article expands on this further and also provides other examples of how and why figuring out how to split costs is messy. Might be worth reading and pointing to specific things you disagree with rather than just saying, "No, you!" over and over, if you actually want to have a conversation on the topic.
It is still obvious. This isn't some new phenomenon. The costs are going to consumers. Not just when the power company has to pay for upgrades which according to their policies and local ordinances may or may not get split, but also as these companies use massive amounts more power causing the supply:demand curve to shift.
We, as in the power companies and any economist with a calculator, can tell you exactly how these costs are getting pushed onto consumers and in some cases by precise amounts as to how much.
This is high school math, not magic.