this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
106 points (94.9% liked)

Selfhosted

60451 readers
949 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have docker installed, but only have a vague idea of how it works.

Back in the day, I would just port forward, but even then, I would need a static IP somehow.

I have heard a reverse proxy is an option, but that is an entirely new topic to me.

Surely there is an easy way to access Jellyfin outside of my home network that I'm just missing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Device -> VPN Tunnel (ideally WireGuard) -> Home Router / Server.

The only port that needs to be opened is your WireGuard server which typically is :51820.

The issue with this is you have explain VPN’s and WireGuard to people which, in my experience turns people away as they see it as a hassle.

Alternatively buy a domain, setup DDNS so that your home IP is associated with your domain, setup a reverse proxy and open port :443 on your router however, I would suggest a blacklist-first approach and only whitelist the few known IP’s you can trust.

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I did the last one. Bought a domain for $5 per year from cloudflare and used a cloudflared tunnel to direct traffic to Caddy (reverse proxy). Set up everything as deny-by-default, requiring log in to access things like sonarr, and let things like Jellyfin and Immich bypass the login requirement. Took a bit to get it all figured out, but it worked.

There is also a way to use the cloudflared tunnel for free that gives you a domain as well (sort of anyways).

All of that is run via docker containers, minus the

Documentation on all of this is fragmented and a challenge to figure out. Happy to help anyone who wants to message me about it.

I took this a step further as I use a wireguard tunnel to make use of my router level ad blocking. So I added an entry for my domain to route back to caddy and serve it all locally. This is proving to be a challenge due to the way some browsers handle forced https, but I'm making due.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

and used a cloudflared tunnel to direct traffic to Caddy

There is also a way to use the cloudflared tunnel for free that gives you a domain as well (sort of anyways).

This is DDNS, a popular, free alternative would be ddclient. Essentially updating an A Record so that your dynamic IP is remains associated with your domain.

While cloudflare is also my registrar as well, I don’t use any of the “features” they offer, and opted to use Keycloak for my authentication needs.

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I've debated setting up Authelia or something similar because cloudflare is sooo slow to load their login page, but haven't landed on anything yet... Plus I worry I set something up wrong and expose my network

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I can’t be much of a help with Caddy however, for Traefik you can use the OIDC Middleware to forward requests to your authentication service.

Plus I worry I set something up wrong and expose my network

The only port that would need opening is :443, leave port :80 closed so that people cannot connect to your services insecurely. Slap fail2ban or geoblock on it and call it a day. Also, DDNS allowlist for that deny-first approach.

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

The current config routes through the cloudflared tunnel so no ports are open externally at the moment, so that's nice, but yea, I'd have to imagine there's some documentation out there for caddy.

Caddy has been a pain, though, so I might give one of the others a try. Thanks for the tips!

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Free vps in oracle cloud with Pangolin. Never have to worry about explaining VPNs.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Free vps in oracle cloud with Pangolin

If I’m not mistaken I tried setting up pangolin to work along side my already running Traefik setup and it was just an absolute nightmare.

I just don’t have the time nor energy to reinvent my already running configuration.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I've set it up next to my NPM and it's more complicated, but so much more capable. Traefik is what it uses to proxy things. You're comparing a full suite of tools with just one piece.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Traefik is what it uses to proxy things. You're comparing a full suite of tools with just one piece.

I mean, that’s debatable. Taking a look at their docker-compose.yml there are 3 containers they recommend running, with a 4 optional container.

  • image: docker.io/fosrl/pangolin:latest # Pangolin itself
  • image: docker.io/fosrl/gerbil:latest # WireGuard server
  • image: docker.io/traefik:v3.6 # Traefik Reverse Proxy
  • image: hhftechnology/middleware-manager:latest # Optional middleware manager for Traefik

To say this is a “full-suite” is a bit much when majority of the heavy lifting is done by Traefik, the middleware’s you assign to Traefik and WireGuard. Pangolin if I’m reading this correctly;

“Pangolin combines reverse proxy and VPN capabilities into one platform.”

Which is great! However as I mentioned previously, does not integrate well when these services are already setup to work standalone.

I suspect the same reaction from folks when they hear “download pangolin from the App Store, and use xyz credentials to connect.” And “download WireGuard from the App Store, and use xyz file to connect.”

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Pangolin uses gerbil with newt for those wireguard tunnels. That's a massive improvement already. It also adds a bunch more features like vpn, you can crowdsec, and more that I don't use. To say it's debatable if it's a suite of tools is just wrong.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

People's IP addresses usually change so that might be annoying keeping a whitelist up to date.

A good alternative is something like fail2ban to ban ip addresses that spam your server looking for a way in and potentially geo-restricting access to your country.