this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
12 points (73.1% liked)

Australia

5056 readers
118 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] No1@aussie.zone -5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If the speed limit was 0km/h, no lives would be lost.

You dumb fucking muppet.

[โ€“] yistdaj@pawb.social 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

At the same time, if the speed limit were 100km/h in an urban zone, the death rate would skyrocket. Ultimately I think it's reasonable to say it's about finding the best compromise between speed and safety, and in an urban environment, it's actually less of a compromise than you might think.

In areas with traffic, the determining factor for how fast a driver gets to their destination is not speed, but throughput: how many cars go past a certain point (eg. a traffic light) in a certain time interval. However, as speeds go up, so do safe breaking distances at a rate proportional to the speed. So you don't actually get where you want to go significantly faster by increasing speeds, because the rate at which cars pass remains practically constant.