this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
220 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

86105 readers
2942 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I dunno why they don't just outlaw manufacturing your own firearms without a license...

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

The don’t want to send a case to the Supreme Court that would rule on the side of homemade firearms.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They would prefer to outlaw manufacturing anything without paying rent seekers.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 16 points 1 day ago

Seems that way. Next up is licensing fees for printing certain models. Basically they'd like to get as far as when Picard says "Tea, Earl Grey, hot" the replicator says "Brought to you by Lipton. Taste good, feel good. You have 49 remaining replicator credits."

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It'd probably be wildly unconstitutional?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nothing in the Constitution about who can or can't construct firearms. Not that anyone cares about The Constitution anymore.