this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
434 points (99.1% liked)

The Onion and other satire w/ layers

2590 readers
855 users here now

For posting satire from The Onion and other similar sources.

redundancy, but not for its own sake


Human crafted content only please! If reporting a violation or suspicious content please provide evidence in the report or a direct message. Thank you.


Be nice. All instance rules apply.


Rules:

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • No Ads / Spamming.
  • No pornography.

Règles :

  • Soyez respectueux. Tout le monde doit se sentir le bienvenu ici.
  • Pas de bigoterie - y compris le racisme, le sexisme, le capacitisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie ou la xénophobie.
  • Pas de publicités / Pas de spam.
  • Pas de pornographie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cintari@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Apparently the actual sale of Infowars is still tied up in court. What they're doing here is just creating their own Infowars despite that, consequences be damned. Alex Jones isn't in any position to protect the trademark and The Onion is calling it parody.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Alex Jones doesn't own any IP any more. His bankruptcy estate owns the shares in the business that used to be his. So Alex Jones can't sue for any infringement. In fact Alex Jones continued to illegally use the studio and the branding for months after he lost the rights to do so.

In theory Jones's bankruptcy estate's liquidator / administrator could sue on behalf of the estate. But that guy was trying to award the auction to the Onion in the first place.

The Onion tried to strike a short term lease deal, which hasn't been approved yet. So they're just going to make the lease payments to the plaintiffs directly for the time being.

And they think they're in a pretty legally defensible situation, because, hey, who's going to sue them?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

By the way, the court ruled that the judgement can't be discharged in bankruptcy. So Jones is coming out of bankruptcy, and he still owes the full amount (less whatever is collected from the Onion) personally. He doesn't get a clean slate. Any future income of his can be garnished and assets seized down to some minimum. For the rest of his life.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

keep going, I'm almost there